SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:59:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Miles O'Neal wrote:
> Michael Mansour said...
> 
> |> I hear RH is going to open source this.
> |> Does the SL team plan to build this as
> |> well?  Just curious.
> |
> |Where did you hear this?
> |
> |RHN is their bread and butter, I'm surprised to hear this news.
> 
> Slashdot pointed to an ARS Technica article about
> RHEL5, which linked to an article about this, which
> linked to this at inforworld:
> 
>    http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/red_hat_to_open.html
> 
> I was pretty surprised, too.  I suspect he's right, that
> this is a reaction to Oracle.  Whether it'll stick, who
> can say? 8^/
> 
> -Miles

First off, I'll believe it when I see it.  I read that article a while 
ago, and I'm still a bit skeptical.
But it does make sense. RHN is migrating to yum, and as a result, I 
believe their satalite servers are as well.  So by the time they open 
source it, there isn't going to be *that* much to open.  But RedHat will 
  be integrating it all together in a nice package, that's what people 
are going to pay for.

If it happens, will we merge it into S.L..  I personally don't want to 
comment one way or another.  We'll see when it happens.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2