SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2024

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:41:07 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I'll take a look!



Pat



On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 20:34 +0000, Seth Lohr wrote:

> 

> [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender

> 

> 

> Since 2024-03-24 (5 days ago) there's been an uptick in issues when

> trying to rsync off this URI:

> 

> 

> rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/

> 

> 

> This is the error we're getting

> 

> 

> Error message:

> @ERROR: max connections (150) reached -- try again later

> rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at

> main.c(1656) [Receiver=3.1.2]

> 

> 

> The various looking around I've done seems to point to stuck

> connections in some capacity, but I'm unsure whether this is a

> problem on our side (client) or if it's an issue with scientificlinux

> only being able to handle 150 concurrent connections on the rsync

> port.

> 

> 

> Am I alone in being the only person to see this issue start in the

> last week?  We've been syncing the repository since at least 2013. 

> Issues like this come up sporadically, but in the last 22 syncs since

> the 24th, this issue has happened 13 times of of the 22.  The other

> times, our since finished in about 1 min or two.

> 

> 




ATOM RSS1 RSS2