SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steve Gaarder <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:46:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
RHEL/SL is abandoning 32 bits, but many other distros continue to support 
them, and probably will for while.  Debian is one example; they even still 
support PowerPC.

Steve Gaarder
System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
[log in to unmask]

On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Keith Lofstrom wrote:

> I was sad to learn that there will not be a 32 bit version of
> SL7 / RHEL7 .  I run older T60 laptops with 3x4 aspect ratio
> screens, and have a stockpile of spares and screens and keyboards
> that should last a long time.  I dislike "runt screen" AKA wide
> screen displays.  However, my venerable laptops use 32 bit
> processors.
>
> I hope to have enough 3x4 goodness to last as long as I do, and
> machines that will keep working for my wife (and her business) who
> will likely outlive me.  However, Redhat stops providing security
> support of the 6 series of distros after 2023.  I love the SL
> community, and would love to keep upgrading SL distros forever,
> and also keep using the old 32 bit machines, but it appears that
> I must give up one or the other soon, or deal with some big
> changes when I no longer have the ability to adapt to them.
>
> Are there other distros with even longer LTS policies than SL and
> RHEL?  Is there some way to keep supporting SL6x with security
> updates long after RH stops providing them?  Some in our community
> may have built measurement systems around 32 bit CPUs that must
> keep collecting data far into the future - what is the plan?
>
> Keith
>
> -- 
> Keith Lofstrom          [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2