SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Summerfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:39:40 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Billy Crook wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 02:33, John
> Summerfield<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> It seems that removing this isn't so straightforward either:
> 
> It is assumed that anyone skilled enough to safely be able to take
> care of their own updates would know how to disable the behaviour of
> those updates being applied automatically.

That assumption is ill-conceived. If I were new to Linux and 
particularly RHEL/RHEL-Clone and if it is documented behaviour, I would 
most likely have picked it up. However, I've been using Red Hat Linux 
and its successors since 3.0.3 and its been my primary OS since RHL 5.0. 
Without retraining, and I've never had any training in Linux, most 
people probably won't pick up all the changes.

> chmod -x /etc/cron.daily/yum.cron

I missed that one. Fixed.

> 
> Those who aren't, won't, and will be better off for it.

Even that's not clear to me. In any event, most tyros would be using 
Fedora or openSUSE or Ubuntu. Those are where all the noise is, and 
where the latest and greatest can be found, and they are what I use if I 
don't mind the possibility it might get borked from time to time. As 
Fedora does.

My wife's system (which might be CentOS5) asks her whether apply 
updates. That's far preferable to just doing it.

> 
> And by the way John, I tried to send this to you directly, but
> mx1.mailhop.org (your incoming mailserver) is trusting a malicious
> blacklisting service, SORBS.  Please contact the administrators, and
> ask them to cease discarding legitimate mail.

Last I looked at SORBS, its future was under a cloud. I did though check 
my IP address against it last week and it was fine then.

In any event, I have my own rules that prevent most of the world from 
sending email to herakles.homelinux.org. I whitelist selected list 
servers by use of DNAT firewall rules. If your mail server's not on the 
whitelist, it attempts delivery to mail.js.id.au and that server refuses 
to relay it. Connections from whitelisted sites go to a second server 
inside my LAN.

It's just crossed my mind, you may have misread the message your 
received. Even though SORBS' future is under a cloud, I decided to use 
it. One of its lists is of dynamic/dialup IP addresses. I've monitored 
the email that gets rejected, and it seems most probably it is spam. I 
don't expect to get much email from continental Europe, South America, 
China or Asia.

If you do not use your IAP's email service to relay your outgoing email, 
you will have problems sending email, and not just to me.

I do not use mx1.mailhop.org. If it's not on my whitelist, it cannot 
send email to herakles.homelinux.org whether it's in a SORBS list or not.

I receive this list, I will see any replies directed to it.

> 


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
[log in to unmask]  [log in to unmask]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2