SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Orion Poplawski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:02:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On 02/13/2015 07:59 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:28:06PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Given that they're going to have to run systemd, and that they're
>> still dealing with Gnome bloat if you need graphics, Assume that
>> every major release is roughly 30% more CPU and RAM than the
>> previous release, and you won't be too far off.
>
> If systemd is a major resource hog, then our high-performance-
> machine comrades will come up with something that leaves more
> CPU cycles for doing computation over the next decade.  I hope.
> Zillion-CPU computing is intolerant of expensive waste.  If RH
> someday insists on intolerable resource misuse, we are in the
> right community for a mutiny and a new direction.

I really can't see systemd described as a "major resource hog".  In what 
way?


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  [log in to unmask]
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2