Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Robert P. J. Day |
Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:59:15 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 05:35:30AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > first question -- is there any sane reason not to use LVM these
> > days? the manual opens (predictably) with showing the student how
> > to allocate fixed partitions during the install, and leaves LVM
> > setup for later in the week as an "advanced" topic. i see it the
> > other way around -- LVM should be the norm nowadays.
>
> No reason to use LVM. The traditional "md" software raid is much
> simpler and easier to manage (only one tool to learn - mdadm,
> compared to the 100 lvm management programs). Historically, LVM is a
> knock-off of XLV which was the companion partitionning tool to SGI's
> XFS filesystem.
perhaps showing my ignorance but does mdadm allow you to do things
like resize "partitions"? i haven't worked with it, but i was under
the impression it was strictly for RAID. perhaps i'll have to read up
on it soon.
rday
--
=======================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
=======================================================================
|
|
|