Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:48:36 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gasser Marc wrote:
> Hello SL Users,
>
> We have for instance the following situation:
>
> - SL51 host with kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 (among others)
>
> - kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 2 1.4.6 73.slp5
> is installed but removed recently from the update repo.
>
> - kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 0 1.4.6 58.SL5
> is still in the sl51base repo, but not installed
>
> Now, when I am running "yum update" on a SL51 system with the
> kernel kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 installed, the kernel-module
> plugin (package yum-3.0.6-3.sl) tries to install
>
> kernel-module-openafs-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 0 1.4.6 58.SL5
> from the sl51base repo. Eventually, yum fails with the corresponding
> message "blabla which is newer is already installed".
>
> Why does the kernel-module plugin
> only check what's the newest version of a kernel module
> in the repo and sets it to be installed,
> regardless if the version installed is newer.
>
Because we hadn't heard of anyone putting a higher epoch in their
kernel-modules and then taking them out.
epoch's are dangerous things and must be handled with care.
To be honest, kernel modules are hard enough to get working, if I throw
in epoch checking, it's going to go over the top and start breaking things.
Right now, the only thing I can say is to take out the kernel module
with the higher epoch by hand.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI LMSS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|