SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:17:56 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (34 lines)
Thanks for the info!

Any idea about the current life-expectancy of 304 as far as updates go
(especially security updates)? 




> [log in to unmask] writes:
> 
> > Hello,
> >   I'm about ready to do a fresh install on several servers I run.
> > I'm wondering if I should just go with SL304 now, or wait a bit for
> > version 4?  Any opinions?  Will there be an upgrade path from SL304 to
> > SL4, or will v4 require a fresh install?  
> 
> A week ago or so we had a vid. conf. with RH regarding RHEL 4.  They
> were asked this same question and said that there is no guarantee for
> an in-place upgrade between 3 and 4, (depending on what has been
> installed), but that it might work.  If you want to attempt it they
> recommended first trying with a non-production system which is setup
> similar to production systems.
> 
> Given that SL is "somewhat similar" to RHEL I assume this same
> recommendation applies.
> 
> As to install 304 or 4 some of the main differences that I would
> consider are kernel and GCC.  4 comes with Linux 2.6 and GCC 3.4.
> Since these are servers, the other big change that may be important to
> you is the incorporation of SELinux which is turned on by default.
> 
> -Brett.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2