On 12/22/2011 02:50 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 04:40 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>> On 12/22/2011 02:22 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2011 04:10 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>>>> On 12/22/2011 01:39 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>>>> Scientific Linux 6.2 BETA 1 i386/x86_64 December 22, 2011
>>>>
>>>> Any sign of spice-gtk?
>>>
>>> Yes, it is.
>>>
>>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/os/repoview/spice-gtk.html
>>>
>>>
>>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/spice-gtk.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>>
>> Now I can not find libspice-client-glib. Not under the "L's" (or "S").
>>
>> :'(
>>
>> -T
>
> Resolving dependencies by hand can be very frustrating. I would suggest
> letting yum do the work for you. You can always add a repo for 6rolling
> and only enable it when you wish to test packages from our development
> tree.
>
> NOTE: Anything in the 'rolling' trees are considered works in progress
> and are made available for testing to ensure that the next version of SL
> is tested by more than just Connie and myself.
>
>
> $ rpm -qp spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.i686.rpm --provides
> libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3
> libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3(SPICEGTK_1)
> libspice-controller.so.0
> spice-glib = 0.6-2.el6
> spice-glib(x86-32) = 0.6-2.el6
>
> $ rpm -qp spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.x86_64.rpm --provides
> libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3()(64bit)
> libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3(SPICEGTK_1)(64bit)
> libspice-controller.so.0()(64bit)
> spice-glib = 0.6-2.el6
> spice-glib(x86-64) = 0.6-2.el6
>
>
> Pat

Hi Pat,

# yum localinstall spice-gtk-0.6-2.el6.x86_64.rpm 
spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.x86_64.rpm

did the trick.  Thank you!

-T