SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: VMs of EL and other environments
From:
zxq9 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
zxq9 <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:06:03 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least
> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the
> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things at once and
> therefore getting each different virtualization technology wrong in
> different ways.
> 
> If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and configure pair-bonding in the
> virtual appliances.

Aside from the previous reply, I get that you think KVM is a steaming pile how 
does this relate to Yasha's question? More to the point, how do you feel about 
VirtualBox as an enterprise platform?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2