SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:27:44 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines)
I see jdk-1.6.0_29-fcs rpms in 
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/java/
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/

I note that the previous 32bit jdk - jdk-1.6.0_26-fcs.i586.rpm -
was signed (though the 64bit one was not), but the _29 rpm is not.

I've forgotten how Troy managed to sign the 32bit version
but this email from the list might give a clue:
[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2