Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:51:36 +0100 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Troy,
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
[...]
>>> NOTE: I haven't gotten XFS (the file system) to compile yet for it.
Removing the now conflicting definitions from the xfs header seems correct
to me. Something like adding
grep -q 'BH_Unwritten' %{kernel_src_path}/include/linux/buffer_head.h && \
sed -i '/^BUFFER_FNS.*unwritten/d' linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h
to %prep. It's hard to fix it with a patch without breaking builds for
the older kernels. An SRPM with this hack is
http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/~wiesand/SL5/xfs-0.4-2.sl5.src.rpm
It builds and survives light testing with the new kernel.
[...]
>>> yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update kernel\*
>>
>> --> Processing Conflict: kernel conflicts ecryptfs-utils < 44
>>
>> (only a problem if ecryptfs-utils is installed ...)
>>
> I now have the newer ecryptfs-utils (and ecryptfs-utils-devel) in the testing
> area.
There's a similar issue with cpuspeed. The new conflict doesn't work
because they missed that cpuspeed has epoch=1, but things may still break
if that isn't updated along with the kernel. It probably only affects
AMD CPUs only.
Any ETA for 5.3? ;-)
- Stephan
> You might have to do a "yum --enablerepo=sl-testing clean all" but it should
> work now.
> Thanks for testing
> Troy
>
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY - DV -
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
|
|
|