SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: yum memory leak?
From:
Ken Schumacher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ken Schumacher <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:59:48 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
On Dec 20, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:

> 
> Since you state that you have other SLF 4.4 systems that do not have this problem so what is the difference between them?

There are a large number of RPMs that differ between these nodes.  I actually have several nodes that are working just fine.  I have two nodes (jpsi1 and jpsi2) that suffer this same failure.  I am still comparing the RPMs installed to see what these 2 systems have in common that the other nodes may not have.

> Does rpm have similar issues?

No RPM command that I have attempted has failed.

> 
> -connie

==============================================================
Ken Schumacher  <[log in to unmask]>  (o) 630-840-4579 (f) 630-840-3109
Computing Div/HPC  LQCD Group   Loc: WH8E   http://www.usqcd.org/fnal/
Fermi National Accelerator Lab; PO Box 500 MS 120 Batavia, IL 60510-0500

ATOM RSS1 RSS2