On 14/08/11 15:28, Phil Perry wrote:
> On 14/08/11 14:25, jdow wrote:
>> On 11:59, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Vincent
>>> Verhagen<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> As I don't have access to the web site admins email addresses, a
>>>> heads up
>>>> for them via this list :)
>>>> I'm having trouble accessing the SL site
>>>> (http://www.scientificlinux.org).
>>>> I get a "500 Internal server error".
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Vincent Verhagen
>>>
>>> The site is still down. I'm sure the admins are receiving mail from
>>> this list but just in case, I cc'd this to Troy and Connie.
>>>
>>> Akemi
>>
>> For the record, Akemi, this (obviously) made it to the list.
>>
>> It made it into the spam folder due to hitting this rule:
>> URIBL_BLACKB Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
>> [URIs: scientificlinux.org]
>>
>> Somehow I think that was somewhat erroneous of URIBL.
>>
>> {^_^}
>>
>
> Thanks for the heads up on the URIBL listing. I have submitter status
> with URIBL so have requested a delisting. I can confirm it's currently
> still listed. My delisting request is pending review.
>

Looks like it's fixed now, and listed on the whitelist so it won't get 
blacklisted by mistake again.

BTW, the website is now back up (at least for me). I wonder if the 
blacklisting at URIBL was a result of the website being down - maybe an 
automated listing of a domain appearing in mail flow with no 
corresponding website.