SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Scientific Linux Users <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:03:40 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (816 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes)
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:48:34AM +0200, Frank Schluenzen wrote:
> >I don't have the lm_sensors package excluded, I just don't use the
> >lm_sensors as supplied by SL but the one supplied by ATrpms, as
> >it's much more updated and supported the chipset on the motherboard
> >I am running on that server.
> >
> yup, that explains it. atrpms package supplies libsensors.so.3, not .1, 
> which "breaks" dependencies only for the most recent kdebase update. [NB: 
> Probably means that one couldn't install atrpms lm_sensors on centos 3.8 
> either]

Good point, I once had a lm_sensors270-2.7.0-13 and
lm_sensors281-2.8.1-1_4 packages that were providing the compatibility
libs. But I moved them away some time ago after checking dependencies
in RHEL3 - I probably missed the kdebase dependency.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


ATOM RSS1 RSS2