SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: systemd (again)
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:51:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines) 
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:06:02PM -0800, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> 
> Well, hm.  My questions about systemd (some may be hard to measure):
> 
> 1) Does systemd use a LOT more RAM, like > 200MB, that cannot swap out?
> 2) Does systemd use a LOT more CPU cycles, slowing down user performance? 
> 3) Will systemd require Gnome 3/4/5/..N to manage properly?
> 4) Can systemd /var/log files (or equivalent) be logrotated?
> 
> If the answers are ...
>

Why are you asking us?!?

Install SL7 or a recent Fedora and make your own measurement, draw your own conclusions.

-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2