SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: TESTING - jdk (java) update for SL4 and SL5
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:47:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:37:34PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/java/
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/
>> jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.i586.rpm
>> jdk-1.6.0_10-fcs.x86_64.rpm
>> java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.10-3.sl5.jpp.i586.rpm
>> java-1.6.0-sun-compat-1.6.0.10-3.sl5.jpp.x86_64.rpm
>> java-1.5.0-sun-compat-1.5.0.90-2.sl.jpp.noarch.rpm
> 
> 
> Troy, can you clarify - these rpms will have proper gpg signatures?
> 

No,
The jdk rpm's will not have the proper gpg signatures.
We  have not had a 100% success with the signing using an older version of rpm.
That is one of the reason's why I'm so anxious to get openjdk into the 
distribution.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2