SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:11:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Paul Stauffer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> [Sorry if this is a repeat; I don't think my initial reply made it to the
> list.]
>
> On 12/13/2011 12:38 PM, Denice wrote:
>> In case you have disabled ipv6 on an SL6 machine, then you need to be
>> aware that the recent update to nfs-utils introduced a bug on those
>> systems. It has been reported:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765909
>>
>> and nfs-utils needs to be downgraded until there is a fix for this.
>
> As noted in the RH bugzilla entry, this appears to be a SL build issue, not
> an upstream bug.  A straight rebuild of SL's SRPM with no changes fixes the
> problem.  Most likely there was a problem with the build environment used to
> produce the SL binary RPM.
>
> I would recommend that this be addressed with some urgency.  Given that
> autofs attempts to unmount idle filesystems every 5 minutes, most affected
> systems probably have many GB worth of core files sitting in / by now,
> potentially leading to a full root filesystem and the myriad problems that
> causes.
>
> cheers,
> - Paul

Aren't our faithful SL maintainers using mock? And are they using mock
with pinted to the "current" release, or including updates and the
"rolling" packages?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2