SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: bash not updated?
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:36:00 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines) 
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Robert E. Blair wrote:

> I don't see an errata rpm for the latest update of bash available at 
> updates.redhat.com.  Is there a reason for this?  The latest version SL 
> has is bash-2.05b-29.0.3 which is a little less than a year old.  Redhat 
> has this plus an update in Feb. of 2005, bash-2.05b-41.4.  It is a 
> bugfix (not a security update).  I'm wondering why it was not released 
> by SL as an update.  Anyone have an answer?

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-437.html

It is a bugfix update that was released as part of Update 5.  Update 5 is 
in Release Candidate 1 status now.

ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/30rolling/

> 
> Thanks,
> Bob Blair
> 

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2