SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:40:17 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 04:12:13PM -0500, Connie Sieh wrote:
>> SL 3.0.x and 4.x both have apt for rpms.  But apt does not do well with
>> multiarch releases and it is not maintained as much as it used to be so we
>> took it out for SL 5.
>
> apt-rpm's maintainer is rather active and was even recently employed
> by Red Hat. If you thing there are issues with apt, please report it
> to him, perhaps even through bugzilla.redhat.com (although they will
> first land on my table, but perhaps the Auto-Cc in bugzilla will work)

Did not know this.

>
> FWIW apt and multiarch work fine on i386/x86_64 and ppc/ppc64
> systems. I've heard about issues on ia64 some time back, but don't
> know if they were fixed or not.
>

Last time I had tested it did not work.  What version of apt supports 
multiarch?

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2