SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL vs. RPMForge repo
From:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lamar Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:02:50 -0400
Content-Type:
Text/Plain
Parts/Attachments:
Text/Plain (9 lines) 
On Friday, April 15, 2011 11:47:07 AM you wrote:
> Phil In looking into the background of non-pae c
>  pu's this seems an issue for mobile processors Pentium M based 400mhz FSB and before. 
>  One wouldn't think that there were this many devices out there still kicking, but I guess I am wrong.

Heh, I have Pentium II's, III's, and even a couple of Pentium Pro's still in production, in addition to a dozen or so Pentium M laptops (unsure of FSB, but these laptops are probably PAE-capable); also several Pentium III and 4 laptops.  If it works, and does the job reliably.....

On the non-linux side, have a VAXstation 4000 still up, controlling a heavily modified Perkin-Elmer PDS-2020 microdensitometer......aka 'a scanner' even though it weighs 7,000+ pounds avoirdupois.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2