On 03/01/2012 03:12 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 04:34 AM, g wrote:
>> during recent update, yumex returned error;
>>
>> "Error checking package signatures:
>>   Package jdk-1.6.0_31-fcs.i586.rpm is not signed"
>>
>> update completed via "yum --nogpgcheck update".
>>
> 
> We are unable to sign the jdk packages, and have not done so 
> historically.  The package provider will now allow modification to the 
> package file.  Private attempts to sign the rpm have resulted in 
> packages which cannot be installed.
-=-

interesting.


> The jdk package is the only package in SL which should not be signed.
-=-

even more interesting.

this is first time that i have had signature problem.

-- 

peace out.

tc.hago,

g
.

*please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted*

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it.
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better.
So I installed Linux.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****