SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:27:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Jeffrey D Anderson wrote:
> Adobe has finally released the updated version of acroread for SL5, but this 
> version does not run on SL4 or SL3.
> 
> However, I see that Redhat has released a patched version of acroread-8.1.4 
> for RHEL 3 and 4, available only through RHN.  Is there any hope of getting 
> patched versions of acroread for SL3 and 4?  CERN packages an rpm of acroread 
> 8.1.2 for SLC4, but that was released last December, and so doesn't address 
> the latest PDF security issue.
> 
> Is there any hope of getting a patched acroread for SL3 and SL4?  What's the 
> legal deal with binary only rpms that get released to RHEL extras?  I suppose 
> that they can't be redistributed by SL?
> 
> Thanks,

Adobe's products (flash-player and acroread) have very strict 
distribution policies.  We cannot distribution them.
A past version of acroread did have a loophole in it's license, but that 
was years ago, and the license was changed years ago.
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI LMSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2