SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 23 May 2015 18:46:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:16 AM, ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 05/20/2015 03:36 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>
>> That means that once a new major release of RHEL is out, it aims to be
>> rock solid and stable for a long time
>
> Sometimes. Other times it freezes bugs and instabilities in
> place, like the kvm bugs I reported. It is a double edges sword.

AFAIR, the kvm bugs that you reported were RFEs.

Within a release, RH's very conservative when considering RFEs and
rarely if ever does it do apply them; by default, it only fixes "real"
bugs.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2