SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:44:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Hi Stephen,

I'd suggest a 'yum clean expire-cache' on the systems not recognizing the new 
packages.  You may have old metadata on them.

I would encourage you to consider mirroring via rsync, rather than reposync.  
Rsync will let you preserve hardlinks (and we've got a lot of them) which 
should translate into less space used on your end.

http://www.scientificlinux.org/download/mirroring/mirror.rsync

Pat

On 04/10/2013 11:30 AM, Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
> I have a locally hosted mirror of SL 6.[234] to manage about 200 systems.  I 
> use a reposync and createrepo to keep them updated daily.  So far I've been 
> accomplishing my upgrades for minor releases using yum and haven't had any 
> troubles.  But the systems that I've upgraded to 6.4 are showing some 
> strange yum behavior.
>
> After the upgrade the system does not see any updates.  For instance on 6.3 
> the autofs package is 5.0.5-55, 6.4 has 5.0.5-73. Systems that I did a yum 
> upgrade on will not see 5.0.5-73 as an available update.
>
> What I've tried so far:
>
> If I change yum to use the scientificlinux.org repos the updated package is 
> seen with no problem.
>
> I can install the new autofs package with a "yum localinstall <filename>" 
> and that has no problems so it shouldn't a problem in the rpm itself unless 
> there's a problem that effects createrepo but not installation of the rpm.
>
> I've poked around in the primary.xml.gz file and it appears to be correct 
> but I'm not sure that I'd spot a problem in there.
>
> It seems to be some problem with the createrepo utility but I've had no luck 
> finding any errors or warnings to indicate where the fault might be.
>
> I'm going to try to find a spare system that I can do a clean install of 6.4 
> and see what happens with that.
>
> Does anyone have an idea of what could cause this?
>


-- 
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2