SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Elias Persson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Elias Persson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:10:02 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On 2013-04-11 13:35, Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
> Got an rsync of the 6.4 repo done and set up one system to use it and
> that system still does not see the newer autofs contained in the base os
> repo.  Not sure if there are other packages in this same state, autofs
> is one that we use heavily here so any updates to it are noticed pretty
> quick.  When I saw that it was available in the 6.4 repo and noticed
> that none of my 6.4 systems were getting that update it raised a flag. I
> can still run a "yum localupdate <path to new autofs>" and it works just
> fine.  But there seems to be something wrong with the package or the
> repo keeping it from being seen as an update to the 6.3 version.
>

What yum plugins are in use? Something like protectbase or priorities 
perhaps?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2