On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos.
> They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster 3.4 client is
> now included in RHEL and the server version which was in EPEL was too
> old to work with the client included with RHEL,
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/
> you have to pick the right repo for the version you want for example 3.4 is here
> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> >> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was available from sl-security.
> >> >However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from EPEL installed, the update failed since
> >> >glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not available.
> >> >Does anyone have an idea when this package will be published? Do I have to wait for SL6.5?
> >> >
> >> >Regards,
> >> >
> >> >Peter van Hooft
> >>
> >> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6.
> >>
> >> I've only got
> >>     glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>     glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm
> >>
> >> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list the server
> >> package either.
> >>
> >> Pat
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pat Riehecky
> >>
> >> Scientific Linux developer
> >> http://www.scientificlinux.org/
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with server
> > The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely.
> > I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer it though, except
> > for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their* glusterfs packages.
> > The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be precise: the glusterfs-api
> > package) are needed for other package upgrades.
> >
> > Peter
> 

I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because they made that into a layered product for their
storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it?
I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the team here.
Thanks all.

Peter