SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 348 updates?
From:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
ToddAndMargo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:18:54 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: [log in to unmask] [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of ToddAndMargo [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:02 PM
>> To: scientific-linux-users
>> Subject: 348 updates?
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>       348 updates?  Did we, by chance, just go to SL 6.6?
>>
>> -T

On 11/12/2014 12:12 PM, Steven C Timm wrote:
> This is what Pat referred to a couple weeks ago of a bunch of SL 6.6 errata that would be available
> as security updates to the older SL6's.
>
> Steve
>

Hi Steve,

Happy to have them, but "huh".  I am still on 6.5:

      $ cat /etc/redhat-release
      Scientific Linux release 6.5 (Carbon)

Is 6.6 about to hit?

-T

ATOM RSS1 RSS2