Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Michael D. Malik |
Date: | Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:08:42 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have 2 of these Athlon 64 systems running 32-bit SL40 here at UNM and
we have not had any problems, so it looks like experiment is in
agreement with theory. Our configuration includes MSI K8N Neo4
motherboard, Asus Nvidia 6600 PCIx video, SATA HDD and once the Nvidia
Nforce4 LAN, audio, and video drivers (32-bit) were installed,
everything was as smooth as can be (had to download drivers on another
system since LAN driver not supplied by SL4 default). -Michael
Mark Nelson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello
>
> I'm about to purchase a couple of new systems, my supplier can only
> supply me with a AMD 64 (this is due to a couple of hardware
> computability issues), can I run the 32 bit version of SL4 on a AMD 64,
> I know I'll take a performance hit but I'm not that bothered about that.
> Can anyone see any issues?
>
>
> Mark.
> - --
> - -------------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Nelson - [log in to unmask]
>
> IPPP, Department of Physics, University of Durham,
> Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE
> Office: +44 (0)191 334 3811, Direct Dial: +44 (0)191 334 3653
>
> PGP Key: http://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/~mn/pgp_key.txt
> This mail is for the addressee only
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDZjk2lzM++u0MgcERAk/fAJ958eICXUMHso5elc5kJfQtBUaUygCfY35D
> dMF5OkKFhK2suMsx+Ak8j9g=
> =XuFb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
|
|
|