On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:35:35PM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Sorry, forgot the link
> 
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-October/018052.html

That doesn't add any kernel support. It only addresses the userland
part that are already covered by what packages exist at ATrpms for
example, so he's not any further than before.

What needs to be done is a backport of the kernel drivers to 2.6.9 and
add it as a patch to the kernel src.rpm.

> Troy
> Troy Dawson wrote:
> >Steve,
> >Here is a posting to the CentOS mailling list detailling how one of 
> >their users did it.  This is for lm-sensors 2.10.1, so it is fairly 
> >recent.  They even have a spec file at the end.
> >
> >If that works for you, let us know and we'll put it into the contrib area.
> >
> >Troy
> >
> >Steven Timm wrote:
> >>It appears that the analogous kernel modules for SL4
> >>never got made in the ATRPMS repository.
> >>Does any scientific-linux based site out there actually
> >>have lm_sensors 2.9.x or 2.10.x working in combination
> >>with an SL4-based Enterprise kernel as distributed by our dear 
> >>Upstream Vendor? If so, how? lm_sensors list is saying it can't be done.
> >>
> >>Steve Timm
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Maarten Ballintijn wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Steve,
> >>>
> >>>I am using :
> >>>
> >>>i2c-kmdl-2.4.21-37.ELsmp-2.9.2-3.el3.at.x86_64
> >>>lm_sensors-2.9.2-42.el3.at.x86_64
> >>>lm_sensors-kmdl-2.4.21-37.ELsmp-2.9.2-42.el3.at.x86_64
> >>>
> >>>from the ATrpms repository on our Opterons.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net