SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Axel Thimm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:34:27 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (954 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (194 bytes)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:44:55PM -0700, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Subtitle: does Fedora actually suck?
> 
> Hi folks.  This isn't a troll.  We run SL on all of our server systems 
> and most of our client systems around here, and I'm pretty happy with 
> the situation, except for one thing: we get requests fairly frequently 
> for software that our user community genuinely must have, but that is 
> not in the current version of SL.  (Examples include Python 2.4, PHP 
> 5.x, MySQL 5.x, etc.)

Exactly the same issues crop up at CentOS and CentOS tries to package
up "extras" or "plus" repos to satisfy these user needs.

Packaging such "extras", "plus" etc bits would be something that SL
and CentOS could perhaps indeed share together. Most probably these
repos can be used directly on SL (haven't tried it myself, perhaps
someone else has and can share positive/negative experience with
SL/CentOS compatibility on this sector)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


ATOM RSS1 RSS2