SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:54:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Tom H <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, why did you use mock? Are you more familiar with it
>> than with rpmbuild or was there a particular reason?
>
> none whatsoever - i just thought it would be interesting to see if i can
> build with it. Essentially I had to mock --no-clean --shell and then just
> use rpmbuild in that chroot env, to build the kernel. The only "advantage"
> was that it removed all needed for compilation packages after i was done. I
> doubt it's a good enough reason to insist or recommend mock for this
> particular use.

OK, thanks.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2