SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2006

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miles O'Neal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:12:07 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Troy Dawson wrote:

> Although we are not compatible with Fedora, many of the Fedora 
> packages can be recompiled to work with Scientific Linux if you really 
> need to. Just remember that Fedora Core 1 packages tend to compile ok 
> with Scientific Linux 3.0.x, and Fedora Core 3 packages tend to 
> compile ok with Scientific Linux 4.x.

I have found that, in the absence of a RHEL3
RPM, a RH9 RPM will usually work just fine
with SL3.

It seems like whichever FC release is closest
to RHEL4 should work with SL4.

I realize this isn't a guaranteed compatibility,
but it's something people can check into.

-Miles

ATOM RSS1 RSS2