SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
better: Q&A: Centos vs SL
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:02:41 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (442 bytes) 
> Are you saying they got them for free?
http://www.zdnet.com/red-hat-reveals-centos-plans-7000027812/

The goal is to gain some understanding of what may result.

Regards,
Dave

On Thu Nov 27 13:58:37 CST 2014, "Patrick J. LoPresti" 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Jos Vos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Red Hat did not buy CentOS.
> 
> They employ the principals and own the trademark.
> 
> Are you saying they got them for free?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2