On 12/22/2011 04:40 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
> On 12/22/2011 02:22 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> On 12/22/2011 04:10 PM, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2011 01:39 PM, Connie Sieh wrote:
>>>> Scientific Linux 6.2 BETA 1 i386/x86_64 December 22, 2011
>>>
>>> Any sign of spice-gtk?
>>
>> Yes, it is.
>>
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/os/repoview/spice-gtk.html 
>>
>>
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/repoview/spice-gtk.html 
>>
>>
>>
>> Pat
>>
>
> Now I can not find libspice-client-glib.  Not under the "L's"  (or "S").
>
> :'(
>
> -T

Resolving dependencies by hand can be very frustrating.  I would suggest 
letting yum do the work for you.  You can always add a repo for 6rolling 
and only enable it when you wish to test packages from our development tree.

NOTE: Anything in the 'rolling' trees are considered works in progress 
and are made available for testing to ensure that the next version of SL 
is tested by more than just Connie and myself.


$ rpm -qp spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.i686.rpm --provides
libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3
libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3(SPICEGTK_1)
libspice-controller.so.0
spice-glib = 0.6-2.el6
spice-glib(x86-32) = 0.6-2.el6

$ rpm -qp spice-glib-0.6-2.el6.x86_64.rpm --provides
libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3()(64bit)
libspice-client-glib-2.0.so.3(SPICEGTK_1)(64bit)
libspice-controller.so.0()(64bit)
spice-glib = 0.6-2.el6
spice-glib(x86-64) = 0.6-2.el6


Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer