Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:25:37 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 29/10/13 16:25, Elio Fabri wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 11:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Life don't work that way. Since you're using Scientific Linux, you
> > have the option to do this:
> >
> > yum install yum-confi-epel # This enables the EPEL repository
> > yum install audacity # This will fetch audacity from the upstream EPEL
> > repository, and resolve the other dependencies as well from EPEL and
> > the other available repositories.
> OK. I installed the EPEL repo.
>
> On 10/27/2013 11:02 PM, John Pilkington wrote:
> > I just installed the 32-bit version. The 32-bit versions of all the
> > above packages (including audacity) are in the epel repo and yum should
> > install them if you have that repo enabled. I uaed yumex, but I think
> > the command line would be yum --enable-repo=epel install audacity
> I couldn't find che 32-bit version.
> There is a 64-bit beta version instead.
> Maybe because it's beta, it cannot import mp3 files, but is better than
> nothing.
>
> Thank you both
Glad you got it.
I installed the 32-bit version because that's what my (old) machine
needs. I just hadn't checked if all the equivalent 64-bit packages existed.
The mp3 limitation will likely be to avoid any potential legal
challenges. The other suggested source in this thread might not have
the same restriction, but I have no idea how reliable it might be.
I notice that you sent your reply to the list-owner as well as the list.
The 'reply' mechanism here seems rather strange but I think you should
only send to [log in to unmask]
Cheers,
John P
|
|
|