SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 May 2005 10:08:31 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Connie Sieh wrote:

> Note that kernel-source is not required if all you need to do is make 
> new kernel modules.  See the releasenote segment that I just sent for info 
> on how to do this.
> 
> -connie sieh
> 
> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
> > Jean-Michel Barbet wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I cannot find the RPM kernel-source for SL40. Something wrong or
> > > I am not looking at the right place ?
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > > 
> > > JM Barbet.
> > 
> > There is no "kernel-source" rpm on S.L. 4.x.  You'll need to talk to the 
> > RedHat developers about that one.

Do not really talk to the RedHat developers about Scientific Linux as they 
do NOT support Scientific Linux.

> > There IS a kernel-devel for each of the kernels (kernel-devel, 
> > kernel-smp-devel)
> > There is ALSO a kernel-xxx-src.rpm.  Which has an easily modified spec 
> > file and configure files, AND, the full kernel source, if you really 
> > really need it.
> > This is documented in the release notes.
> > Troy
> > 
> 
-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2