SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
carlopmart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
carlopmart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:55:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On 08/22/2011 05:32 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 AM, carlopmart<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>> Thanks Troy and sorry for my delayed response. But I have antoher question.
>> Will scientificlinux release security fixes updates during EUS of certain
>> release like 6.0 until upstream it marks as an EOL??
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1106.html
>>
>> This is a security fix released by upstream vendor, but I didn't see if this
>> package is released for SL6.0
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the SRPMS for EUS are not open to the public, so
> they cannot be built.
>
> Akemi

Uhmm ... Thanks Akemi. But why kernels 2.6.32-131.x are released for 
SL6.0 when these kernels are for SL6.1 release?? Is it safe to install 
kernel 2.6.32-131.x version on a SL6.0 host?? I dont's see it pretty 
clear ...

-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2