SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2015

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:52 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1286 bytes)
Taylor, et al,

Appreciate the feedback. However, my searching (14 registered 
repositories, RHEL and SL documents, RHEL/SL 6 releases of java 1.8 and 
security updates) finds no SL 7 supported rpm for java 1.8.

So, does RHEL/SL 6 java 1.8 release work on SL 7 or has it been packaged 
for RHEL/SL 7? If for 7, it seems not to be in an SL or RHEL repository?

Thanks again,
Mark Hansel

On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Taylor Braun-Jones wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>       Name 2.
> 
> 
> Why two? If one critical application doesn't work without Oracle Java, then
> I'm going to install Oracle Java to get it working. For me that application
> is WebEx meetings. Feel free to try for yourself though. I'd love to be
> proven wrong:
> 
> http://www.webex.com/test-meeting.html
> 
> (I was never able to get all the features working with OpenJDK, particularly
> desktop sharing)
>  
>       Seriously: I've heard this again and again since Java.... 1.4?
>       I've not actually encountered any instance except where someone
>       hardoced something, deliberately, to *insist* on it. And ever
>       since
>       Java 1.5.0, as soon as I or a colleague broke that lock, the
>       alternative OpenJDK worked just fine.
> 
> 
> You're one of the lucky ones I guess.
> 
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2