SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2013

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:55:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
"mock" is a pretty cool tool to build cleanly with. I use it
extensively. But it's a *huge* burden of compilation time and CPU
cycles for building new packages, especially if you lack the resources
to configure it for and maintain an internal CentOS or Scientific
Linux mirror to build your chroot cages from.

I'm often saddened, but not shocked, to find that people porting
packages haven't bothered using it.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2