SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2008

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:59:13 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Hi Stephan,
Well, it sounds like we have two calls for a wait, and we're not going 
to hear any from the US because today is a holiday.  I was really not 
wanting to push this out on a friday, and a holiday, so I'm going to say 
this isn't going to go out until sometime middle of next week.
If people want it, they can get it out of testing.  But I'm not 
comfortable enough with it to push it out on everyone on a friday and/or 
a holiday.
Have a good weekend.
Troy
p.s. I am pushing out the seamonkey and firefox 1.5 for SL3 and SL4.  I 
haven't seen any problems with those, just some misconfigured scripts on 
our end that delayed things for a bit.

Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> Hi Troy,
> 
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Troy Dawson wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andreas,
>> They look the same as SL 52 packages because they are the same.  Which always
>> makes me suspicious on a major upgrade like this.  We did need to update the
>> prelink for SL 50, but that is already in the security errata from an earlier
>> security errata.
>>
>> I personally do not use autoconfig and do not know how much this is going to
>> impact people.  How prevalent is this?
> 
> well, we know that at least Jon's site relies on it as well. I guess it's
> quite common at least on larger sites.
> 
>> It looks like the bug isn't even being worked on yet, even though it is over
>> a month old.  Part of me wants to wait, but another part of me hates holding
>> up a critical security errata.  And this one I've already messed up and let
>> it slip a couple of days.
>>
>> What if I sent out the security errata with a warning that says to put the
>> link there if you need to run autoconfig?
> 
> It's not just the link, the config files also have to be installed in
> different locations.
> 
> And of course there are more serious changes that will cause headaches fro
> sites doing central administration and/or having home directories on
> central filesystems. /usr/lib/firefox-<version>/plugins is no longer
> searched (breaking the jpackage way of providing the java plugin). And the
> consequences of having an sqlite DB in ~/.mozilla - which is fsync'ed
> several times per web page loaded - could be quite serious for sites with
> ~ in NFS or (especially) AFS.
> 
> This update is quite a nightmare. Our site can not and will not roll it
> out for the time being, certainly not on a friday. Other sites may
> appreciate a big fat warning and/or some more delay. But then, those
> likely to have serious trouble should be controlling and testing their
> updates anyway.
> 
> Cheers,
>         Stephan
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Stephan Wiesand
>    DESY - DV -
>    Platanenallee 6
>    15738 Zeuthen, Germany


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2