SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
carlopmart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
carlopmart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:58:19 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On 08/12/2011 11:37 AM, Andreas Petzold wrote:
> 	Hi,
>
> On Friday, August 12, 2011 10:54:06 carlopmart wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>    Due to a certain bugs and problems with cluster stack on SL6.1
>> (corosync, cman, kernel, etc) release (all problems are reported to
>> upstream), I need to maintain two hosts at SL6.0 version.
>>
>>    Is it possible to do this applying all security errata only for this
>> version?
>
> SL doesn't force you to upgrade to the new ".X" releases and unless you
> changed the standard yum repos this will not happen automatically. To be sure
> that certain packages are not upgraded, simply exlude them in the yum config.
>
> 	Cheers,
>
> 		Andreas

Thanks Andreas, but security updates are applied?? For example, last 
kernel version for SL6.0 is kernel-2.6.32-71.29.1, and for SL6.1 is 
2.6.32-131.6.1. When I will launch "yum update", kernel will updated 
with 71.29.1 version or with 131.6.1 version?? It is only an example, 
but I am referrering to all packages for SL6.0 version ...



-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2