SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2004

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Date formats, e.g YUM:hostname.tld:10/23/04
From:
Perret Yannick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:59:31 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Troy Dawson wrote:

>
> Before I answer you question, I have changed my mind.  Local people
> has sat
> down with me and talked with me about this.  (Don't know why I had
> sorting
> dates so messed up in my head, but I did).  So I am now in favor of
> yyyy-mm-dd
> is that is what others want.
>
I'm also for this one. It is ASCII-sortable, so it do not need any
special knowledge
or sort-rule definition (which is not the case for -Jan-, -Feb-... dates).

--
Yannick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2