SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2014

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: VMs of EL and other environments
From:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:10:01 +1000
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (880 bytes) , signature.asc (900 bytes) 
On 08/04/14 14:06, zxq9 wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2014 22:52:57 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Name 2. Seriously. The KVM management tools are *not* good., at least
>> in Scientific Linux 6 or the upstream vendor's toolkits, because the
>> underlying libvirt toolkit is trying to do too many things at once and
>> therefore getting each different virtualization technology wrong in
>> different ways.
>>
>> If you think I'm kidding, go ahead and configure pair-bonding in the
>> virtual appliances.
> 
> Aside from the previous reply, I get that you think KVM is a steaming pile how 
> does this relate to Yasha's question? More to the point, how do you feel about 
> VirtualBox as an enterprise platform?
> 

I'm a little biased - but check out: http://xen.crc.id.au/

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

ATOM RSS1 RSS2