Jon Peatfield wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Frank Schluenzen wrote:
> 
>> I also didn't see problems updating kdebase, but am kind of surprised 
>> that the previous version of ksysguardd (kdebase 3.1.3-5.11) was 
>> apparently not linked against libsensors, so prior to 3.1.3-5.16 there 
>> was at least no libsensors.so.1 dependency ?!
> 
> But kdebase-3.1.3-5.11 *does* depend on lm_sensors which also provides 
> libsensors.so.1 anyway -- at least in the copies I have.  Most curious!
> 

Yes, you are correct, so lm_sensors *should* have been installed on the system.

You can check the rpm's by doing "rpm -qR" on installed packages or "rpm -qpR" 
on uninstalled packages.   Here is the output from the i386 rpm in SL 308

$ rpm -qpR kdebase-3.1.3-5.11.i386.rpm | grep sens
libsensordisplays.so.0
lm_sensors
$

And from the errata we just sent out

$ rpm -qpR kdebase-3.1.3-5.16.i386.rpm | grep sens
libsensordisplays.so.0
libsensors.so.1
lm_sensors
$

There is a difference, but the end result should have been the same, in that 
lm_sensors should have been installed.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________