I believe we are planning to archive the content.



Pat



On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 23:00 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender

> 

> I can see it myself from home. I do note that RHEL 7 is being

> obsoleted within a couple of months. Will the Scientific Linux 7 at

> this site be archived, or kept alive indefinitely?

> 

> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 4:41 PM Patrick Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>

> wrote:

> > 

> > I'll take a look!

> > 

> > Pat

> > 

> > On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 20:34 +0000, Seth Lohr wrote:

> > > 

> > > [EXTERNAL] – This message is from an external sender

> > > 

> > > 

> > > Since 2024-03-24 (5 days ago) there's been an uptick in issues

> > > when

> > > trying to rsync off this URI:

> > > 

> > > 

> > > rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/

> > > 

> > > 

> > > This is the error we're getting

> > > 

> > > 

> > > Error message:

> > > @ERROR: max connections (150) reached -- try again later

> > > rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at

> > > main.c(1656) [Receiver=3.1.2]

> > > 

> > > 

> > > The various looking around I've done seems to point to stuck

> > > connections in some capacity, but I'm unsure whether this is a

> > > problem on our side (client) or if it's an issue with

> > > scientificlinux

> > > only being able to handle 150 concurrent connections on the rsync

> > > port.

> > > 

> > > 

> > > Am I alone in being the only person to see this issue start in

> > > the

> > > last week?  We've been syncing the repository since at least

> > > 2013.

> > > Issues like this come up sporadically, but in the last 22 syncs

> > > since

> > > the 24th, this issue has happened 13 times of of the 22.  The

> > > other

> > > times, our since finished in about 1 min or two.

> > > 

> > > 

> >