SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tobias Fiebig <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Tobias Fiebig <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:49:42 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hello,

> I think we both replied at about the same time. I will try the package
> that you indicated.

> Our beloved upstream vendor backports security fixes all the time.  I 
> would be surprised if there was a meaningful security issue that they 
> haven't brought back.  That is one of the things they pride themselves on.

If you are upgrading concerning a security fix, I'd like to point out
that Pat is more than right. 
Which CVE are you specifically looking into?


Btw:
http://bmu.wsp.wybt.net/repos/loserpms/x86_64/
http://bmu.wsp.wybt.net/repos/loserpms/i386/

Build the rpms now.

With best regards,
Tobias

ATOM RSS1 RSS2