SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2007

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:44:46 -0600
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (40 lines)
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Paul Barrett wrote:

> I originally installed CENTOS4.4 to try something new and was having this=
>
>
> problem so I installed SL4.4 instead and still have the problem.

Both Centos and SL use the same kernel.  So I would expect that they are 
the same.

>
> System is a IBM Workstation P4 with 512megs of ram and an nvidia card. I
> removed the Firewire card. SL Linux is installed in an almost minimal ser=
>
> ver
> install with vim and elinks as options.
>
> The problem is that after setting the time with rsync and hwclock within
> about two ours they are drastically out of sync. The Hwclock has the corr=
>
> ect
> time but the systime by issuing 'date' is wrong. I have checked the
> /etc/sysconfig/clock and it is set to utc=3Dfalse and both the hwclock an=
>
> d
> systime will be correct after doing the rsync.
>
> Additionally and most desturbing is the following. If I issue the date
> command multiple times sometimes it returns a result that can be a few
> seconds to a minute earlier than previously reported.
>
> Is systime interupt driven and if so what irqs might have a conflict?
>
> Any thoughts whatsoever could help.

> Thanks in advance.
>

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2