SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: signing jdk-1.6.0_29-fcs rpms
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:07:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
On 10/23/2011 04:27 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> I see jdk-1.6.0_29-fcs rpms in
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/java/
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/java/
>
> I note that the previous 32bit jdk - jdk-1.6.0_26-fcs.i586.rpm -
> was signed (though the 64bit one was not), but the _29 rpm is not.
>
> I've forgotten how Troy managed to sign the 32bit version
> but this email from the list might give a clue:
> [log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]
>

I'll take a look.  Knew I was missing a few bits so I didn't announce 
them for testing.  Hopefully I'll get this straightened out and have an 
announcement for testing out later today.

Thanks for keeping an eye out!

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2