SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2005

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: bash not updated?
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:46:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Robert E. Blair wrote:
> I don't see an errata rpm for the latest update of bash available at 
> updates.redhat.com.  Is there a reason for this?  The latest version SL 
> has is bash-2.05b-29.0.3 which is a little less than a year old.  Redhat 
> has this plus an update in Feb. of 2005, bash-2.05b-41.4.  It is a 
> bugfix (not a security update).  I'm wondering why it was not released 
> by SL as an update.  Anyone have an answer?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob Blair

Because we do not put bugfixes in the errata.
That version of bash will be in 3.0.5, and is currently in the 30rolling.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/CSS  CSI Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2